OS GSO IEC/TR 62470:2014

IEC TR 62470:2011
Omani Standard   Current Edition · Approved on 25 December 2014

Guidance on techniques for the measurement of the coefficient of friction (COF) between cables and ducts

OS GSO IEC/TR 62470:2014 Files

English 14 Pages
Current Edition Reference Language

OS GSO IEC/TR 62470:2014 Scope

This technical report describes three techniques to measure the coefficient of friction (COF) between cables and ducts. For a given technique, cable construction, installation method (pulling, pushing, or blowing), and duct size, the relative values of the COF can give some indication as to the relative ease of installation. The techniques can be used for traditional cables and ducts (see IEC 60794-3-10) as well as for microduct cables and microducts (see IEC 60794-5). A fibre or fibre unit may be evaluated in place of a cable in all techniques. Methods A, B, and C are distinguished by the equipment used for measurements: • method A – using a wheel around which the duct is wound, a cable with attached weight being pulled through the latter, while measuring the force needed for this; • method B – using a device to clamp a duct specimen, a cable specimen placed inside, tilting both while measuring the angle at which the cable specimen starts to slide, or the angle which sustains sliding; and • method C – using a device to clamp and straighten a cable specimen, a duct specimen placed around it, tilting both while measuring the angle at which the duct specimen starts to slide, or the angle which sustains sliding. The COF when the cable is not moving with respect to the duct is the static COF, and will increase until sliding suddenly starts. The COF while the cable is sliding within the duct is the kinetic or dynamic COF. It should be noted that the static COF will generally be a higher value than the kinetic COF. The results from the three methods can be compared qualitatively, but are not represented as being equivalent. None of the methods are represented as being the Reference Test Method. Method A will yield the kinetic COF; methods B and C will yield both static and kinetic COF. Both the static and kinetic COF may be dramatically affected by lubrication of the cable and/or duct. While not specifically addressed herein, the intent of these methods may be used with lubricated cable/duct samples. These methods do not constitute a routine test used in the general evaluation of the installation performance of cables in ducts. This parameter is not generally specified within a detail specification.

Best Sellers From Electrical Sector

GSO 2530:2016
 
Gulf Standard
Energy Labelling And Minimum Energy Performance Requirements For Air-Conditioners
OS GSO 2530:2016
GSO 2530:2016 
Omani Standard
Energy Labelling And Minimum Energy Performance Requirements For Air-Conditioners
OS GSO 34:2007
GSO 34:2007 
Omani Standard
LEAD-ACID STARTER BATTERIES USED FOR MOTOR VEHICLES AND INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
GSO 34:2007
 
Gulf Technical Regulation
LEAD-ACID STARTER BATTERIES USED FOR MOTOR VEHICLES AND INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES

Recently Published from Electrical Sector

GSO IEC 61362:2026
IEC 61362:2024 
Gulf Standard
Guidelines to specification of hydraulic turbine governing systems
GSO IEC TS 62271-313:2026
IEC TS 62271-313:2025 
Gulf Standard
High-voltage switchgear and controlgear - Part 313: Direct current circuit-breakers
GSO IEC TR 63411:2026
IEC TR 63411:2025 
Gulf Standard
Grid connection of offshore wind via VSC-HVDC systems
GSO ISO 20816-21:2026
ISO 20816-21:2025 
Gulf Standard
Mechanical vibration — Measurement and evaluation of machine vibration — Part 21: Horizontal axis wind turbines